Super Returns: Don’t Be Greedy

By Glenn Dyer | More Articles by Glenn Dyer

The AMP’s chief strategist and economist, Dr Shane Oliver says the slump in shares has boosted their medium term return potential.

But he believes low investment yields generally point to sustainable returns of around 8.5% for a diversified mix of assets, with Asian and Australian shares and listed property the most attractive from a strategic perspective.


Thanks to the credit crunch, high oil prices and rising interest rates in Australia most super funds had negative returns over the last year and investment markets remain very difficult.

The current set back provides an opportunity to consider what is a sustainable rate of investment return.

Such set backs also throw up opportunities in terms of the relative attractiveness between asset classes.

There’s always a cycle and the starting point matters.

The chart below highlights how investment markets go through bull and bear phases that may last 10-20 years.

There are several points that follow from this:

 

  • First, very long-term returns measured over say the past 100 years are not necessarily a good guide as to what may happen over any 10 year period.
  • The average real return on Australian shares since 1900 was 8.2% pa, whereas 10 year ended returns over the same period ranged between -4% and +19%.
  • The last 10-20 years is also not a reliable guide to the next 10-20 years. Eg, the dismal 1970s provided no guide to the 1980s and 90s bull market in shares.

     

  • As most investors’ investment horizons don’t extend much beyond 10 years, the 10-20 year investment cycle should be allowed for in setting their strategic asset allocation to each asset class. A good place to start is to look at the starting point yield for each asset class.

Put simply, the higher the better.

 

Very high return drivers have run their course

Since the early 1980s equities and most other asset classes have generated very strong returns.

The following table provides a comparison of “balanced fund” returns over the last few years with those that would have been implied by asset class returns over the last century or so.

The 2003 to 2007 period and indeed the last 25 years saw returns well above what appears to be sustainable on the basis of returns over the last century.

The key drivers were the shift from high inflation in the 1970s to low inflation which boosted equity and bond returns as price earnings multiples pushed higher and bond yields fell; the “chase for yield” over the last five years which pushed down yields on other assets and hence pushed up their returns; and unsustainably strong profit growth.

All of these drivers have arguably run their course.

The broad downtrend in inflation appears to be over, investment yields were pushed to very low levels and profit margins and profit shares of GDP have reached record levels.

Indicative return expectations for the medium term

For most assets, current investment yields provide the best starting point for assessing likely medium term returns.

For equities, a simple model of current dividend yields plus trend nominal GDP growth (as a proxy for earnings and hence capital growth) does a good job of predicting medium term returns.

This approach allows for current valuations (which are picked up via the yield) but avoids getting too complicated in making assumptions about whether yields (or price to earnings multiples) will rise or fall.

The next two charts show this approach applied to the US and Australian equities, where it can be seen to broadly track the big swings.

For property, sustainable returns can be proxied by current rental yields and likely trend inflation as a proxy for rental and capital growth.

For bonds, the best predictor of future medium term returns is the current bond yield – because if you hold a bond to maturity the return will be the bond yield.

Using current yields, this framework results in the following medium term (ie, 5 to 10 year) return projections.

One drawback of this approach is if dividends are cut dramatically during tough times, as has recently been the case for several Australian companies, particularly in the highly geared infrastructure and property sectors.

However, dividends for the market as a whole are normally relatively stable as most companies like to manage dividends smoothly. They rarely raise the level of dividends if they think it will be unsustainable. As can be seen below, dividends per share are relatively smooth compared to earnings.

Only when earnings collapsed in the early 1990s did dividend payments fall significantly.

It’s also worth noting that the dividend pay out ratio has actually fallen in Australia from just above 80% a decade ago to 63% now. While earnings may slow over the year ahead a collapse is unlikely and so a big fall in dividends is unlikely.

But just as a precaution we have discounted the dividend yields for Australian shares and REITs by 5% and 15% respectively.

About Glenn Dyer

Glenn Dyer has been a finance journalist and TV producer for more than 40 years. He has worked at Maxwell Newton Publications, Queensland Newspapers, AAP, The Australian Financial Review, The Nine Network and Crikey.

View more articles by Glenn Dyer →