So the Australian dollar is hovering above, at or just under the 80 US cent level, depending on the time of day in the trading cycle.

It finished above 80 USc Tuesday night and started trading around that level here today.

It’s risen to what is about its highest level in 10 years and analysts are all saying it was as a result of the low key warning on Friday by the Reserve Bank’s Deputy Governor, Malcolm Edey that some of the factors which pushed up inflation were still evident and still a concern.

Mr Edey is the RBA’s chief economist: he is the Deputy Governor, economic, and that probably makes him almost as influential as the Guv, Glenn Stevens.

That’s why his words last week were important where as a similar speech at the start of the month was not taken as seriously because they didn’t include phrases used on Friday.

This is the key phrase: “This outlook is still higher than ideal: it implies that inflation is more likely to be too high than too lower in the period we can foresee”.

It’s called jawboning, a word I’ve used many times to describe speeches by key officials in the US and here. Edey’s speech was no different.

Although it was a statement of the obvious to some in Australia, it also came as traders in the US started wondering if there was a chance of rates being cut this year, rather than left on hold.

Even though some looked at US producer and consumer price indexes last week as suggesting that inflation was returning (albeit in a small way), others looked through the figures, factored out volatile oil and food prices and said no way.

Then there’s the US housing slump and the problems in the subprime and lower levels of the prime mortgage markets which show no signs of improving. This week sees a number of key figures for the housing industry and the betting is that the problems still have a way to go before things get better.

Uranium bulls are snorting and stamping the ground as world prices rise towards the $US100 a pound level.

Just when we were basking in the strength of the economy, along comes someone to remind us of the need for a dark cloud or three.

It didn’t take long for the Chinese Government to act to try and further control an economy which is starting to look like it is getting out of hand.

Another series of tests for the sluggish American housing market this week which is trying to cope with lower demand, oversupply and now the crisis battering the subprime mortgage sector which is threatening to spillover into the sounder parts of the home mortgage industry.

Talk about being read the riot act.

If New Zealanders hadn’t got the message after last week’s interest rate rise to a new high of 7.50 per cent; and after more warnings this week after strong rises in house prices and retail sales, and a firm admonition from Finance Minister Michael Cullen, Kiwis copped a blast from New Zealand Reserve Bank Governor Alan Bollard.

He told a business conference yesterday that the days of easy money were over and that “exuberance” by consumers and banks (mostly Australian!) to borrow and lend had undermined his attempts to slow consumer spending and cool the overheating housing market.

Using words that recalled former Federal Reserve Governor Alan Greenspan’s 1996 comment about “irrational exuberance” in stock prices as the net and tech booms gathered pace, Bollard sent a very strong signal that he may have to increase interest rates even further consumers curtailed their current borrowing binge.

“We need to see realization amongst borrowing households and lending banks that this period of cheap international money has been unusual. That means thinking about other eventualities ahead, and in some cases showing less exuberance.”

According to the RBNZ’s website, total household debt rose 13 per cent to NZ$150 billion in January from the same month in 2006. That’s an almost doubling in the past five years.

Analysts say New Zealand has become a favoured destination for some big international investors who borrow at half a per cent in Japan in yen and then move the money to New Zealand where the gross margin is around seven per cent: much of this cheap money is being organised by the big local banks who then use it to finance their current mortgage war.

Before last week’s increase official rates were steady at 7.25 per cent for well over a year.

Complicating the matter is that well over 80 per cent of all home loans in New Zealand have an interest rate that is set for a fixed term, unlike here in Australia where we favour variable rates. That means it is very hard to influence the housing and home buying sectors in NZ by moving interest rates.

The downside is that the rates on business are variable and these are transmitted very quickly (and rates on personal loans and credit cards are variable): so you can have declining exports, a sluggish economy but booming house prices and solid activity in and around the industry.

No wonder Governor Bollard is sounding more than a little frustrated and why pie in the sky ideas of a levy on mortgages have surfaced and then been knocked down.

The Governor summed up the situation with this comment: “It is New Zealand households’ desire to keep investing in housing, while at the same time consuming strongly, that fuels their demand for funds”.

I think the chances are rising there will be a very rough landing.

With the NZ economy increasingly dominated by Australian corporates (banks, media and retailing) the fallout will bounce back here through the various profit and loss accounts and balance sheets.

It won’t be shattering, but it will be a reminder that being big in a very small market can hurt financially.

There may be worries about global growth and the health of US financial markets but here in Australia its been a surprisingly upbeat week: sunny in fact.

The economy is going well, retail sales are humming (a bit too fast for some), business and consumer confidence has recovered strongly from the battering at the hands of oil and petrol prices in the middle months of 2006, the resources boom shows no sign of tiring, the Chinese and Japanese economies are surging.

Inflation is a bit too high for comfort, wages growth is at the top end of the limit of around 4 per cent a year, our terms of trade are improving and personal income continues to rise.

The only concern is for problems among the no doc/low doc mortgage borrowers and some credit card debt.

Compared to the gloom around in the September quarter and towards the end of the year, the turnaround has been remarkable.

It seems like we have rebounded strongly but in fact it’s been a small but noticeable uplift.

It’s the change in confidence that’s made the difference, and now for the impact on the broader stockmarket.

With all the reservations expressed last month by Reserve Bank Governor, Glenn Stevens in the first Monetary Policy Statement of the year and then before the Housing of Reps. Standing Committee on Finance and the Economy, it’s clear the Australian economy is galloping along very nicely.

So after the upbeat figures on confidence and the second tentative signs of a recovery in housing finance, yesterday’s labour force figures for February were a bit of the same stuff.

Some economists however worry that another month with 22,000 jobs created (293,000 in the year to February) sends a flashing warning signal to the RBA.

There was lots of chat about capacity constraints, wages dangers, inflation and underestimating a rate rise but this is not New Zealand with its unbalanced economy, with surging house prices and an ‘easy money regime’ that again drew the ire of Dr Ian Bollard, head of the NZ Reserve Bank, in a speech yesterday.

The February labour force figures show that employment rose 22,000 in the month after falling a revised 4,800 in January.

Markets have recovered from this week’s reminder that things have changed: risk is being rediscovered and downside is now an option and not something someone remembers from history.

Monday it was booming house prices, Tuesday it was booming retail sales: the New Zealand economy is starting to be buffeted by pressures that are proving almost impossible to control without causing wider damage.

There’s been a lot of talk about big nasty private equity buyers and how they are buying up Australia.

While China’s exports continue to grow like topsy there’s good news for Australian exports (especially resource companies) from our largest trading partner, Japan.

On Monday Rio Tinto chairman, Paul Skinner said in the company’s 2006 annual report that the company expected the resources boom to continue because of the strength of demand from China.

Stand by for a rough day on the markets.The gathering US subprime mortgage crisis we’ve been writing about for the past month reared its ugly head today and hit Wall Street hard, assisted by lower than expected retail sales and a fall in the US dollar.

According to ABARE’s Outlook paper last week world gold mine production is estimated to have fallen by around 2 per cent last year, to 2463 tonnes, as higher production in China and South America was more than offset by lower output in South Africa, Australia, the United States and Indonesia.

It’s been one of the most striking features of the world gold market in recent years: the fall of South Africa and the rise of China.

The AMP’s head of strategy, Dr Shane Oliver last week said that ‘it was only a correction’ and we should relax.

It should be a modest start to trading in local stockmarkets today but the factor to look for is the weakness shown by key commodities such as gold, copper, oil, lead and zinc in European and US trading on Friday.

The problems in the US subprime mortgage market continue to resonate through American financial markets, despite official attempts to downplay the problems.

The highlight of the American financial year is the Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting in Omaha, Nebraska, in the great American mid-west.

Each May thousands upon thousands of people gather there for what amounts to a festival whose centrepiece is an annual meeting that can go for hours, with a suitable break for lunch.

No tea and biscuits and a furtive chat with the shareholders before fleeing in a smoked glass limo to an expensive eatery or back to corporate HQ for Buffett, Charlie Munger and others.

It’s been called ‘Woodstock for Capitalism’ and quite a few Australians travel there each year for the experience as much as anything else.

It’s Mid-west folksy, it’s very American and quite a few modern business people would scoff at it but it will draw the best part of 25,000 to 30,000 shareholders from the US and many other countries.

Read this carefully, especially the events surrounding it such as furniture and jewellery sales and special meal deals: many of these businesses are owned by Berkshire Hathaway and the money shareholders spend pays for the whole event and more.

Simple, but obviously something too hard for many of our businessmen in Australia and many elsewhere.

In fact you can imagine some of the types at Macquarie Bank and other high flying investment and financial products companies looking askance at Buffett and Berkshire, or eyeing the annual report (http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/2006ar/2006ar.pdf) and wondering about break up values, and completely missing the point about Buffett, the company and shareholders.

Here are details for this year’s outing.

……………………………

Our annual meeting this year will be held on Saturday, May 5th.

As always, the doors will open at the Qwest Center at 7 a.m., and a new Berkshire movie will be shown at 8:30. At 9:30 we will go directly to the question-and-answer period, which (with a break for lunch at the Qwest’s stands) will last until 3:00.

Then, after a short recess, Charlie and I will convene the annual meeting at 3:15. If you decide to leave during the day’s question periods, please do so while Charlie is talking.

The best reason to exit, of course is to shop. We will help you do that by filling the 194,300 square foot hall that adjoins the meeting area with the products of Berkshire subsidiaries.

Last year, the 24,000 people who came to the meeting did their part, and almost every location racked up record sales. But records are made to be broken, and I know you can do better.

This year we will again showcase a Clayton home (featuring Acme brick, Shaw carpet, JohnsManville insulation, MiTek fasteners, Carefree awnings and NFM furniture).

You will find that the home, priced at $139,900, delivers excellent value. Last year, a helper at the Qwest bought one of two homes on display well before we opened the doors to shareholders. Flanking the Clayton home on the exhibition floor this year will be an RV and pontoon boat from Forest River.

GEICO will have a booth staffed by a number of its top counselors from around the country, all of them ready to supply you with auto insurance quotes.

In most cases, GEICO will be able to give you a special shareholder discount (usually 8%). This special offer is permitted by 45 of the 50 jurisdictions in which we operate. (One supplemental point: The discount is not additive if you qualify for another, such as that given certain groups.) Bring the details of your existing insurance and check out whether we can save you money.

For at least 50% of you, I believe we can. And while you’re at it, sign up for the new GEICO credit card. It’s the one I now use (sparingly, of course).

On Saturday, at the Omaha airport, we will have the usual array of aircraft from NetJets available for your inspection. Stop by the NetJets booth at the Qwest to learn about viewing these planes.

Buffett is 76 this year so succession is looming larger in his mind.

There are candidates, but finding someone with longevity seems to be the key objective.

Here, Buffett spells out the criteria and the way the company is going about renewing the existing succession plan: there’s a telling confession of a big mistake, there’s some good criticisms of CEO remuneration and there’s news of some changes on the BH board.

And there’s an explanation for shareholders on Buffett’s decision to push much of his wealth into charitable foundations and what he expects will be done with it.

All in a direct and forthright commentary:

………………..

I have told you that Berkshire has three outstanding candidates to replace me as CEO and that the Board knows exactly who should take over if I should die tonight. Each of the three is much younger than I. The directors believe it’s important that my successor have the prospect of a long tenure.

Frankly, we are not as well-prepared on the investment side of our business.

There’s a history here: At one time, Charlie was my potential replacement for investing, and more recently Lou Simpson has filled that slot. Lou is a top-notch investor with an outstanding long-term record of managing GEICO’s equity portfolio.

But he is only six years younger than I. If I were to die soon, he would fill in magnificently for a short period. For the long-term, though, we need a different answer.

At our October board meeting, we discussed that subject fully. And we emerged with a plan, which I will carry out with the help of Charlie and Lou.

Under this plan, I intend to hire a younger man or woman with the potential to manage a very large portfolio, who we hope will succeed me as Berkshire’s chief investment officer when the need for someone to do that arises.

As part of the selection process, we may in fact take on several candidates.

Picking the right person(s) will not be an easy task. It’s not hard, of course, to find smart people, among them individuals who have impressive investment records.

But there is far more to successful long-term investing than brains and performance that has recently been good.

Over time, markets will do extraordinary, even bizarre, things. A single, big mistake could wipe out a long string of successes.

We therefore need someone genetically programmed to recognize and avoid serious risks, including those never before encountered.

Certain perils that lurk in investment strategies cannot be spotted by use of the models commonly employed today by financial institutions.

Temperament is also important. Independent thinking, emotional stability, and a keen understanding of both human and institutional behavior is vital to long-term investment success. I’ve seen a lot of very smart people who have lacked these virtues.

Finally, we have a special problem to consider: our ability to keep the person we hire.

Being able to list Berkshire on a resume would materially enhance the marketability of an investment manager. We will need, therefore, to be sure we can retain our choice, even though he or she could leave and make much more money elsewhere.

There are surely people who fit what we need, but they may be hard to identify.

In 1979, Jack Byrne and I felt we had found such a person in Lou Simpson. We then made an arrangement with him whereby he would be paid well for sustained over performance.

Under this deal, he has earned large amounts. Lou, however, could have left us long ago to manage far greater sums on more advantageous terms. If money alone had been the object, that’s exactly what he would have done.

But Lou never considered such a move. We need to find a younger person or two made of the same stuff.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

The good news: At 76, I feel terrific and, according to all measurable indicators, am in excellent health. It’s amazing what Cherry Coke and hamburgers will do for a fellow.

……………………..

The composition of our board will change in two ways this spring.

In selecting a new director, we were guided by our long-standing criteria, which are that board members be owner-oriented, business-savvy, interested and truly independent.

I say “truly” because many directors who are now deemed independent by various authorities and observers are far from that, relying heavily as they do on directors’ fees to maintain their standard of living.

These payments, which come in many forms, often range between $150,000 and $250,000 annually, compensation that may approach or even exceed all other income of the “independent” director.

And – surprise, surprise – director compensation has soared in recent years, pushed up by recommendations from corporate America’s favorite consultant, Ratchet, Ratchet and Bingo. (The name may be phony, but the action it conveys is not.)

Charlie and I believe our four criteria are essential if directors are to do their job – which, by law, is to faithfully represent owners. Yet these criteria are usually ignored.

Instead, consultants and CEOs seeking board candidates will often say, “We’re looking for a woman,” or “a Hispanic,” or “someone from abroad,” or what have you. It sometimes sounds as if the mission is to stock Noah’s ark.

I suppose one of the bugbears of many investors, large and small in every market is the amount of money fund managers make and the excuses they invent when they don’t perform.

The complaints are similar the world over, even from someone like Warren Buffett.

…………………………….

Wall Street’s Pied Pipers of Performance will have encouraged the futile hopes of the family. The hapless Gotrocks will be assured that they all can achieve above-average investment performance – but only by paying ever-higher fees. Call this promise the adult version of Lake Woebegon.

In 2006, promises and fees hit new highs. A flood of money went from institutional investors to the 2-and-20 crowd (that’s private equity).

For those innocent of this arrangement, let me explain: It’s a lopsided system whereby 2% of your principal is paid each year to the manager even if he accomplishes nothing – or, for that matter, loses you a bundle – and, additionally, 20% of your profit is paid to him if he succeeds, even if his success is due simply to a rising tide.

For example, a manager who achieves a gross return of 10% in a year will keep 3.6 percentage points – two points off the top plus 20% of the residual 8 points – leaving only 6.4 percentage points for his investors.

On a $3 billion fund, this 6.4% net “performance” will deliver the manager a cool $108 million.

He will receive this bonanza even though an index fund might have returned 15% to investors in the same period and charged them only a token fee.

Let me end this section by telling you about one of the good guys of Wall Street, my long-time friend Walter Schloss, who last year turned 90. From 1956 to 2002, Walter managed a remarkably successful investment partnership, from which he took not a dime unless his investors made money.

My admiration for Walter, it should be noted, is not based on hindsight. A full fifty years ago, Walter was my sole recommendation to a St. Louis family who wanted an honest and able investment manager.

Walter did not go to business school, or for that matter, college. His office contained one file cabinet in 1956; the number mushroomed to four by 2002. Walter worked without a secretary, clerk or bookkeeper, his only associate being his son, Edwin, a graduate of the North Carolina School of the Arts.

Walter and Edwin never came within a mile of inside information.

Indeed, they used “outside” information only sparingly, generally selecting securities by certain simple statistical methods Walter learned while working for Ben Graham.

A highlight of Buffett’s letter to shareholders is always the disclosure of his big equity holdings: investments worth $US700 million or more.

Warren Buffet is known as the Sage of Omaha. He hasn’t become the world’s smartest investor without learning quite a bit along the way.