LOGIN JOIN SHARECAFE SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER ADVERTISE
share cafe logo  
 
SHARECAFE COMMENTARY

GE's A La Carte Earnings Menu
BY DANIEL WU - 03/11/2017 | VIEW MORE ARTICLES BY THE MONTGOMERY TEAM

Upon opening GE’s (NSYE: GE) quarterly earnings press releases, the first thing that readers see on the top half of the first page is the below image. What may strike first-time readers as unusual is that GE seems to report three different earnings per share (EPS) numbers. In fact, GE explicitly reports four different EPS numbers, hints at a fifth, and leaves prudent investors to calculate a sixth number.

Screen Shot 2017-11-02 at 10.44.59 am

We often come across businesses where management have been excessively liberal with their definitions of “non-GAAP EPS” but GE certainly takes these earnings shenanigans to the extreme.

Let’s start with what is GAAP? Generally Accepted Accounting Principles is a collection of commonly-followed accounting rules and standards for financial reporting.

GE’s complex and opaque accounting, and the use of numerous different earnings measures, have long been a source of complaint from investors and analysts. Now, with performance deteriorating (stock price down -35 per cent YTD) and activist investor Trian Fund Management agitating for change, management may finally be compelled to reduce complexity and report fewer potentially confusing non-GAAP metrics.

For now, GE reports the following EPS numbers:

  1. Stock-standard EPS under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
  2. EPS from continuing operations (GAAP). This measure excludes the earnings impact of operations that have been classified as discontinued on the balance sheet.
  3. Industrial operating EPS (non-GAAP). This measure excludes i) non-operating pension costs, and ii) earnings or loss per share generated by the GE Capital business. The exclusion of “non-operating” pension costs is potentially misleading because this is a real cost of GE’s unfunded pension liabilities, which stood at US$31 billion at the end of 2016. The exclusion of the non-operating components of the net periodic pension cost is equivalent to excluding the interest cost on debt drawn for share buybacks, because share buybacks are not an operating activity.
  4. Industrial operating & Verticals EPS (non-GAAP), which is the previous Industrial operating EPS, plus the earnings from the profitable units of GE Capital that management intend to keep, but excluding the losses from the unprofitable units of GE Capital that management intend to eventually sell, but haven’t gotten around to classifying as “discontinued” yet.

Screen Shot 2017-11-02 at 10.45.47 am

As if that isn’t enough, the third line of the press release (see image at top) mentions a negative EPS impact of $0.16 due to impairments, higher restructuring costs and lower gains. Management is hinting that you should add this incremental $0.16 to whichever of the above four EPS measures you decide to use, and most careless investors probably would without bothering to verify the number.

It is common practice for companies to add back impairments and restructuring costs to their non-GAAP earnings on the premise that these are non-recurring costs that distort the underlying performance of the business. But GE’s disclosure is misleading for two reasons: i) the $0.16 is the incremental negative EPS impact over 3Q 2016 restructuring costs – impairments and restructuring costs in the most recent quarter were actually $0.21 compared to $0.05 in 3Q 2016, hence the $0.16 impact; and ii) the line mentions “lower gains” but the numbers don’t include any gains. (As an aside, it is up to the investor to determine if such “non-recurring” costs are truly non-recurring – some companies report “restructuring costs” every year for years on end!)

Finally, to do the non-recurring adjustments correctly, we must exclude the abovementioned gains on sale of assets, as these likewise distort the underlying performance of the business. But readers won’t find the EPS impact of gains on sale in the press release – they would have to turn to slide 8 of the earnings presentation, a separate document, to find that there was a $0.21 gain on disposal of an asset. To the extent that an investor added $0.21 of non-recurring impairment and restructuring costs to GE’s 3Q 2017 EPS, he would have to deduct a non-recurring $0.21 gain on sale – for a net effect of zero in this quarter, but could have a material impact in other quarters.



View More Articles By The Montgomery Team

Roger Montgomery is the Chief Investment Officer of Montgomery Investment Management, montinvest.com, and author of blog.rogermontgomery.com.

Roger's step-by-step guide to valuing the best stocks and buying them for less than they're worth, Value.able, is available exclusively at rogermontgomery.com. Skaffold is an online stock-picking application that rates ASX-listed stocks from A1 to C5. Watch a demo of Skaffold at www.skaffold.com.



 

SHARECAFE VIDEO


Key movements in the Australian ETF market

More video   

RECENTLY ADDED TO SHARECAFE


 › Telstra Leads ASX Higher Over The Week
 › BHP Leads Another Big Reporting Week
 › Oil Slips As Oversupply Concerns Weigh
 › Traders Add To Record Bearish Positions In Gold
 › Late Rally Lifts Wall St, Tech Still Under Pressure
 › Diary: RBA Minutes, Jackson Hole, Trade Turmoil
 › Monday At The Open
 › Marcus Today End Of Day Report
 › Friday At The Close
 › Hard Work Paying Off For Sheffield Resources
 › Recognition That Lithiums Ain't Lithiums May Help Explain Price Volatility
 › Next Week At A Glance
 › Market At Midday On Friday
 › BLX - Citi rates as Buy
More ShareCafe   

GET THE SHARECAFE BREAKFAST BRIEFING


Delivered free to your inbox before the market opens each trading day. Sign up below +